Showing posts with label SPCA. Show all posts
Showing posts with label SPCA. Show all posts

Wednesday, June 10, 2009

Lindsay Jackel, Melbourne Victoria

Lindsay Jackel is Victorian Director of The Shared Parenting Council of Australia and friend of Barry Williams.


t 2:32 PM 12/23/96 +0000, Lindsay Jackel wrote:

One cannot be homosexual and christian. There is no such thing as a
loving homosexual relationship. Neither can one be feminist and
christian. The 2 deviancies are tied together. Both will be judged
by a God - YAHWEH - who is both loving and righteous. Too many
sexual
deviates tend to forget that YAHWEH is also righteous and that His
righteousness demands judgement and punishment for that and those who
are unrighteous. With your thoughts, words and acts you seal your
own
fate for eternity unless you turn back from the path you walk."


http://groups.google.com.af/group/soc.motss/browse_thread/thread/c1997026db0525f7/714b73f354aac11b?q=lindsay+jackel#714b73f354aac11b


"There is something wrong with being homosexual (it's certainly not
'gay'), with going against design and doing perverted and deviant
unnatural acts and anyone that condones it is also showing their facile
level of understanding. Homosexuals are sick bunnies, determined to
prove to the rest of us that they are normal - hence the concerted pride
push.
Lindsay"

Proof That LINDSAY JACKEL IS A COHORT OF BARRY WILLIAMS




Sam Farrell
View profile
More options Jul 8 2001, 12:25 pm
Newsgroups: aus.legal
From: mst...@my-deja.com (Sam Farrell)
Date: 7 Jul 2001 19:25:00 -0700
Subject: Re: Family law - what it teaches our children (Conference Paper)
Having met both Chris and Lindsay, both online and at Lone Father and
now at Fathers for Family Equity meetings, I can verify that Chris is
definitely not Lindsay and vice versa. From what I've seen both are
working for the good and rights of non-custodial parents (mostly
dads), with Lindsay having a bigger presence (pun intended!) than
Chris online, but encouraging him to take on some of his activity, and
Chris having a more personal face to face presence in the Melbourne
community.
Sam

http://groups.google.com.af/group/aus.legal/browse_thread/thread/85066702e617954d/bef15cc8a8769d30?q=lindsay+jackel#bef15cc8a8769d30

Thursday, February 12, 2009

Michael Green Newtown Sydney


The brayings of feminist groups are rooted in a similar anxiety for self-preservation and in the feminist myth. Their support for the present system reveals a concern about power and money: if mothers share the parenting of children, it follows inevitably that they will have to share control of the family and of the resources that come with it, i.e. the home and financial support.

The need revealed by women’s groups for funding and resources to support abused women and children is well established and accepted. Not so, however, is the radical position that this is the lot of most women and children, particularly in the aftermath of separation or divorce. Radical feminism has done a disservice to women. It has sought to portray them as poor, suffering creatures that need protection from men and from paternalistic institutions. They are unable to speak confidently for themselves, to make their own choices, and are easily led into negotiations where their will and interests are overborne. Such thinking is a grave insult to the majority of women.

Ask any experienced mediator who carries the power in a mediation: almost inevitably the mother with the children.



This guy is the president of the Shared Parenting Council of Australia at night and during the day he works as a mediator specialising in Family Law. Guess who's side he's not on? If you're a woman attending a mediation session at his office, insist on a refund.