Michael Murphy Canada

Michael Murphy whines:

"One of the other sites associated with them is http://ozpigpage.blogspot.com/. On this site they do write-ups of Ozzy men's/father's rights activists which by any standard are slanderous and vile. I note it is private for the time being so maybe they got the message they are crossing over the boundary from fair comment to slander and hate. Are they misandrists. Perhaps! I would suggest to the Ozzy men's rights movement to try and uncover their identities. Then perhaps we can do an expose on who they are, their motives (as if we don't already know) and how much the Ozzy tax payers are putting out for this kind of rubbish."

I say Michael if you think the contents of this blog are slanderous and vile then you should blame the original posters for that and direct any criticisms towards them. All material on this blog comes directly from what the poster has placed on the internet themselves. I agree with you that all of it is vile, hence the necessity for this blog.

Peter Gregory, Mt Barker WA

http://www.facebook.com/people/Peter-Gregory/1663742182

From: Peter
To: fathers4equality@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, August 22, 2008 6:09:46 PM
Subject: Re: [fathers4equality] Sex of abusers & Advice for future DADS!

Not wrong mate,

Also after you have just pulled them out of the bath water as well and dried them off. They usually kick, squeal and stiffen up with excitement. That's the time to give them raspberries on their tummies and run your fingers up and down their bodies. They love it.

Mind you, it was during those tickling torture sessions, that I got shot twice. Once by my first daughter and then a son. You wouldn't believe how far a baby girl can shoot if she is excited. What a laugh it was!
My boy produced a vertical fountain and my girl shot across the room. The bit that was priceless, was the look of shock on their faces, because they never saw themselves doing that before. I almost wet myself laughing at them.
Oh the joys of babies!!

I use to have so much fun with my kids, but the ex was always jealous and in the end tried to drive a wedge between the kids and I. Didn't work, because it was too late, I had already bonded strongly with each child and from that point on the kids only saw her behaviour as bad, bad, bad.

Peter

Jason Thompson Sunshine Coast Queensland

Fathers4Equality seek to deceive the public.

Why is Jason Thompson posing as a woman to leave comments on a Blog? Is that because he is seeking to mislead the reader that the views expressed are from a woman instead of a woman hating divorced man?

This is the email he sent to Fathers4Equality:

---

From: Equiponderate
To: fathers4equality@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, 10 June, 2009 7:34:50 AM
Subject: Re: [fathers4equality] Obsessed!

Naturally these breastfeeding stories are Caroline's continued attempts at hyperbole. Anecdotes of stories of recounts of cases.

If one were to look at the case material of these two breastfeeding cases (and i hope someone does!) it is HIGHLY likely that the mothers were attepmting to use breastfeeding to withhold and alienate fathers INDEFINATELY from a relationship with the child.

I can almost hear the mother's ploy now: "Oh, dear Judge, I want to provide my child with the best possible breastfeeding experience as science suggests it is extremely benificial.. ... and the mothercraft clubs recommend a child be breastfed for up to 7 years of age."

Lol

Jason

And then this (and other ) comment shows up on the Fathers4Equality website under the name of Theresa:

Theresa

Imagine this:

MAGISTRATE: "And how long do you need to breastfeed this child"

ALIENATING MUM: "Oh, shouldn't be more than 18 years"

_____________________________________________________

Naturally these breastfeeding stories are Caroline's continued attempts at hyperbole. Anecdotes of stories of recounts of court-cases.

If one were to look at the actual case material of these two breastfeeding stories (and i hope someone does!) it is HIGHLY likely that the mothers were attepmting to use breastfeeding to withhold and alienate fathers INDEFINATELY from a relationship with the child.

I can almost hear the mother's ploy now: "Oh, dear Judge, I simply want to provide my child with the best possible breastfeeding experience as science suggests it is extremely benificial..... and mothercraft clubs recommend to me that a child be breastfed for up to 7 years of age."

Lol

http://www.fathers4equality-australia.org/equalparenting/FiDBlog.nsf/dx/parent-law-ties-women-to-men?opendocument&comments

I bet all of the other comments attributed to female names are other male members of Fathers4Equality.
Jason Thompson is a moderator of that group.

Shame on Fathers4Equality for lying!!

Father

F is for Family Court, that you’re always in

A is for Abuse, and all other sins

T is for Tricks, dirty ones are all you know

H is for Hatred, driving you on and on so

E is for your Ego, when I do see you I want to vomit and scrub my skin

R is for Resentment, ask your children they’ll clue you in

Put that all together and what does it spell??

Egotistical, controlling, abusive mama’s boy with no backbone.

James Adams, Sydney

From: parttimeparent
To: fathers4equality@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, 11 June, 2009 11:50:31 AM
Subject: [fathers4equality] Are you owed Child Support?

Does anybody know a FATHER who is owed C$A by the mother?

There is a media opportunity to de-bunk the myth of 'Deadbeat Dads', but we need an example.

The truth is that fathers are much more likely to pay thier C$A than mothers are.

Please contact me directly on j.adams@fairfaxmedi a.com.au (Thursday only) or phone 0417 258 264

Lindsay Jackel, Melbourne Victoria

Lindsay Jackel is Victorian Director of The Shared Parenting Council of Australia and friend of Barry Williams.


t 2:32 PM 12/23/96 +0000, Lindsay Jackel wrote:

- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

>Thank you for your opinion, though I can't recall asking for it.
>Perhaps soc.motss need to know the truth. Homosexuality and
>lesbianism are deviant, unnatural perversions that result in diseased
>minds and bodies.

>==========================
>On Sun, 22 Dec 1996 09:43:16 +0000, you wrote:

>This article was posted to soc.motss, a social newsgroup for gay
>men, lesbians, and their friends. It violates the original charter
>of soc.motss and should not have been posted there.

>If you have a problem understanding newsgroup charters or your
>responsibility for knowing where you're posting, refer to the
>postings in news.announce.newusers or ask your sysadmin for help.

>Lindsay Jackel wrote:

One cannot be homosexual and christian. There is no such thing as a
loving homosexual relationship. Neither can one be feminist and
christian. The 2 deviancies are tied together. Both will be judged
by a God - YAHWEH - who is both loving and righteous. Too many
sexual
deviates tend to forget that YAHWEH is also righteous and that His
righteousness demands judgement and punishment for that and those who
are unrighteous. With your thoughts, words and acts you seal your
own
fate for eternity unless you turn back from the path you walk."

http://groups.google.com.af/group/soc.motss/browse_thread/thread/c1997026db0525f7/714b73f354aac11b?q=lindsay+jackel#714b73f354aac11b


"There is something wrong with being homosexual (it's certainly not
'gay'), with going against design and doing perverted and deviant
unnatural acts and anyone that condones it is also showing their facile
level of understanding. Homosexuals are sick bunnies, determined to
prove to the rest of us that they are normal - hence the concerted pride
push.
Lindsay"

Proof That LINDSAY JACKEL IS A COHORT OF BARRY WILLIAMS

	Sam Farrell	View profile	More options Jul 8 2001, 12:25 pm

Newsgroups: aus.legal

From: mst...@my-deja.com (Sam Farrell)

Date: 7 Jul 2001 19:25:00 -0700

Subject: Re: Family law - what it teaches our children (Conference Paper)

Reply to author | Forward | Print | Individual message | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author

Having met both Chris and Lindsay, both online and at Lone Father and
now at Fathers for Family Equity meetings, I can verify that Chris is
definitely not Lindsay and vice versa. From what I've seen both are
working for the good and rights of non-custodial parents (mostly
dads), with Lindsay having a bigger presence (pun intended!) than
Chris online, but encouraging him to take on some of his activity, and
Chris having a more personal face to face presence in the Melbourne
community.
Sam

http://groups.google.com.af/group/aus.legal/browse_thread/thread/85066702e617954d/bef15cc8a8769d30?q=lindsay+jackel#bef15cc8a8769d30

Peter Gregory, Mt Barker WA

Commenting on an Australian Newspaper article about babies being fed half cows milk and half breast milk because judges choose to give fathers 50% access.

"And of course these bitches refuse to express milk during the week to be frozen so that the father can feed the baby it's own mothers breast milk for the week the child is with him. It could be handed over each day fresh if they live close to each other.

The problem as I have said before with these loathsome women, especially of Overington's ilk, is that they have been far too enabled in society and they believe they have 'God' status among human beings.

Just because they have tits that produce milk, is absolutely no reason why a child should be kept away from its father. The father has absolutely no need whatsoever to feed that child cows milk at all ever.
All these disgusting child abusive women need to do is express the milk and bottle it, so their child can get this milk from a bottle.

Women like overington are deliberately pushing this bullshit out there and they expect that the public are too dumb to realise the above facts.

There is no doubt about the facts that these women who agree with this way of thinking, are all currently or potentiall child abusers and husband/father abusers."

Peter


http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?sid=75908cf677aa762d1346b4d7df7c2cd4&id=1663742182&hiq=gregory1athome%40yahoo.com.au&ref=search#/profile.php?id=1663742182